By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Rab said:
Raven said:

The report that the Hill covered in regards to Biden's education was covered by a news station decades ago, it's not a revelatory development.

There's also merit to someone not wanting to dredge up archives that would just provide material for your opposition to nitpick and manipulate during an election year. He has stated that if there were such a complaint, it would be contained within the National Archives and has given permission to access those files. The Republican-led Senate blocked it. Gee, I wonder why they might want to keep this circus going... Meanwhile his accuser has been found to have not only lied about her educational background (she didn't even graduate, at least Biden did even if he wasn't the top of his class), but used that lie to provide testimony under oath as an expert on issues she didn't actually have qualifications for.

Whats good for her is good for him

Biden used the falsifying in public of his education to promote his career by creating a false narrative about himself, it shines a light on the man himself, it's all relevant

If it wasn't for T. Reade making the accusations we would not know about Biden's history in so much detail or the fact he is willing to hide University records from the public view, Im sure other things will now emerge, but not from CNN or MSNBC, they have put their support squarely in Biden's camp regardless of who he really is       

This is not about who Biden really is, this is about a rape incident.  What exactly is your goal here because it seemed to move away from the rape charge to finding dirt on Biden.  It appears that now that the rape charge has enough holes in it with Reade her self not being someone trustworthy enough for her lawyer to stick it seems you have moved on to just finding other dirt on Biden instead.  It seems you have more skin in this game outside of the allegations and instead looking for anything that makes Biden look bad.