By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Torillian on 18 April 2020
Edit Thread
Nautilus said:
Torillian said:

And depending on the area I can see that being reasonable. Some countries can probably loosen the restrictions, some states can do so too, but the poster child for your view point I'd argue is the president of the United States and when he makes tweets about liberating Michigan (where I live), a state with the third most deaths from Corona in the nation, he can fuck right off. There are reasonable discussions to be had but "liberate Michigan" tweets aren't a part of it. 

While I agree with Trump, he is not my poster child.I'm not american, I would argue that most of the users here aren't, so I couldn't care less what he says about one specific situation.I just happen to agree with him on something that I have already made up my mind(and continue to believe I'm correct) way before he or any other president said anything.

I just want you guys to go to the end with your logics.You think that locking down everything might make everyone feel more safe, but what about the person that will have his business ruined because of this and commit suicide(believe me it's more common than you think)?Or those in developing countries that might actually starve to death because he was fired because of the lockdowns(since the employeer couldn't afford to keep the company afloat and pay him)? Or people dying of curable diseases because they couldn't afford paying their health care because they were unemployed and the public healthcare couldn't slot a place for him in time?

Just want you all to think that, the ones defending a more moderate and reasonable "lockdown" is also thinking on the lives of the others, so that we can all mitigate the damage of the virus.

We can talk about mitigating economic impacts, and cooling down the lockdown, but you should not downplay the number of deaths that could occur from a dangerous, highly contagious respiratory virus like this. There are about 800,000 suicides a year and historically economic depression increases suicide rates about 30-40%. 

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/09/suicide-and-the-economy/279961/

"Roy was one of at least 40,000 Americans who took their own lives that year and the next, the two-year span that suicide rate spiked to its highest recorded level ever: more than 150 per 1 million annually." 

This is not a massive increase from the standard levels as we can see from current stats:

"The suicide rate increased 33 percent from 1999 through 2017, from 10.5 to 14 suicides per 100,000 people (NCHS Data Brief No. 330"

Which would be 105 per 1 million. 

And if you look at the great depression in general this did not cause a huge spike in deaths as one would assume based on your concern of greater deaths during economic strife.

https://www.pnas.org/content/106/41/17290

So yeah, we can talk about the possible economic strife that this quarantine can cause, but I would need convincing that a global great depression would cause more deaths than the possible 10m that can quite reasonably occur from Corona (could honestly be as high as 100m). 



...