Chazore said:
That depends, because SC is a totally different story, but at the same time it was made insanely obvious that Sony didn't want a repeat of last gen, in terms of their manufacturing costs, and the costs of parts in general, as well as Nintendo just wanting to make the safest bets possible on their HW. I'm surprised you don't (or refuse to acknowledge) notice just how much the big 3 (or at least 2 of them) want to cut corners and save as much as possible, purely just for RoI. I wouldn't say that's a good thing, nor cheer for it, and cheering just for making money, I dunno why on earth you'd do that either (unless you're working for the company and are on their payroll). Just wanted to make that clear, before things resort to "PC's don't make the money, it's always consoles that do" rhetoric |
Cutting corners is a way to lower costs which means a product can be sold at a lower price which is good for consumers. Considering 2 out of the 3 console manufacturers are also selling their hardware at a loss to keep prices on a decent level I see no reason not to be happy with that.
It's all about hitting that price sweet spot. What's the point of releasing $800 "future-proof-no-corner-cutting"-consoles when no one is buying them? Less sales, less people being able to play modern games, less game support, less money earned. Is that what you cheer for?
As for the sales part I think I was quite clear. I wasn't talking about F2P, MMORPGs and maybe a few other genres where the majority of profit comes from PC and I didn't say that a game from any other genre can't be profitable on PC.