trunkswd said:
thank you for the explanation. I was just thinking since airlines were barely flying at all and the flights they are doing are mostly empty there would be plenty of room for cargo on them. |
They aren't flying, let's say it would cost to much to fly the aircraft without passengers and rely only on carrying stuff on the dock.
For regular aircrafts it is a synergy where you as passenger will cost less because a lot of the cargo space is sold to other companies transportation needs, and these companies also save money on their transporting costs compared to a cargo ship (and have more varied lines) because passengers pay for a lot of the cost while not using the whole cargo space (main reason why we have to pay extra for more luggage, it isn't just a matter of costing more fuel to transport your stuff, but also using space that would be used for other stuff).

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







