Pemalite said:
Say what?
Better without religion.
There is no evidence that any of the spiritual hocus-pocus exists... So religion being based on that is irrelevant.
I disagree that everyone is born selfish and greedy.
|
What now?
Discovered stuff in caves? Without advanced language or... advanced mathematics...etc, which meant no religious doctrine, as well as no science?
I'd like to see those cavemen's proofs. I can't imagine they would've suggested it to simply be "black magic".
---
Probably?
Sure doesn't sound like unquestionable scientific proof. Sounds more like...
I'm not pointing out all the non religious, science related negatives, again. I think we both understand these by now.
---
There never used to be scientific evidence that gravity existed either. Did gravity only come about more recently? Something was going on behind the scenes. Better figure out how to prove what it is? How long do we wait to prove something before we give up? Still waiting on undeniable proof of exactly how the universe came into being. Guess that means the universe doesn't exist, or is irrelevant?
Is Independence Day possible though? Seems like plenty of people aren't against other forms of intelligent life in the universe. If they do exist, could they be as powerful and hostile? Something we don't know for sure and can't say for certain as of now? Sounds sort of like...
If it's important to know that this entertainment is fictional, why isn't that made more clear to kids? Why do we allow kids to play fight based on these idea's and sometimes even hurt each other? Why do we sometimes use this 'insulting' fiction to teach kids a valuable lesson? Does what a youngster learn, mold who they eventually become?
---
If you've spent much time around kids when their 'indoctrinating' parents aren't around, and they understand they can get away with more negative behavior, that's exactly what they do. You can literally watch their sympathy fade knowing they won't get in major trouble for not doing so. Now any good indoctrinated adult wouldn't let that go for long, but it doesn't change the fact that's what occurs as soon as you allow the rules to be bent or broken. Those rules are all part of the indoctrination process, and so why don't they happily and easily follow them? It's not natural, that's why.
Based on that, climate change for example is a joke and shouldn't be taken seriously whatsoever by the public. Until science can undeniably know all factors and what they lead to, exactly, then it should simply be scientific doctrine. No green energy projects, no subsidies for those projects, no green taxes.
Last edited by EricHiggin - on 28 March 2020
