SvennoJ said:
Just be careful not to get into an accident or any other illness because the health care system is currently has better things to do. Oh and don't worry about killing off the 15% of the elderly and causing a lot of those over 30 to get severely ill. Most of them will survive anyway bar some lung scarring. |
At one point you will have to wonder how these high measures will affect the economy, jobs, employment rates across the globe when the vast majority of the global population lives pay cheque to pay cheque. It's easier for us to imagine our big governments printing them moneys and saving the day, but what sort of destabilisation these lockdowns will lead to in third world countries that lack the flexible autonomy to take any meaningful shock-absorbing measures against such economical crash. I don't believe we're being fed the full picture here, and the question" is the cure worse than the disease" will only be more legitimate on a global level.
Unless you want to start the world on a universal basic income program, I am sure the youngsters would take scarred lungs over poverty destabalised nations.
Edit: and to clarify, I am not against or for. It is a serious issue and it's worth looking into the outcome of the decisions being made.