Is Bidens campaign dead? (EDIT: Well, this was turned around completely.)

[EricHiggin]

SpokenTruth said:

EricHiggin said:

Appreciate it, as I don't know how it's written exactly, but that's how I've always heard it said.

Though in today's climate, specifying "men" when woman should be included, is seen as a problem by one side, as well as religion in general. "God" or "Creator" is just a different word for the same thing in that instance, which tends to get avoided by one side if possible as well. That's why it would still make sense that he could have attempted to avoid it. Maybe he didn't, totally possible, but the loss of words isn't much better, when taking into account how often that tends to happen, along with using the wrong words or numbers, more and more often.

Verbal communication is huge for a President, which is one of the reasons why Trump won his election, ironically some would say, so Biden is going to have a really tough time against Trump in this respect. That's not to say Biden doesn't have other qualities that some will prefer over Trump.

The preamble as it was written:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

The preamble with Biden's gaffe and adlibs:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men [and women] are created...[you know , you know the, you know the thing]...equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

So again, if he was trying to say "God" it was wrong to begin with.
And if he was trying to replace "God" or "Creator" with something else....he wasn't even at that part of the preamble yet.  That's 7 words later.

Fun fact: My cousin wrote the DoI. He was 33. Talk about making me feel like slacker.

So to be clear, you're saying the clip doesn't show the full sentence? I saw another short clip earlier, showing the same thing, which is why I assumed that was it. He goes on after the fact and finishes it? If that's the case then the avoidance of certain words wouldn't make sense here, and only the poor verbal communication in general.