| Runa216 said: How in the name of the skies above and the depths below did you come to that conclusion? Did you even read any of my post? I specifically said that a 'nothing' movie is one where there's no central conflict propelling the narrative and that it's just a sequence of events happening. That is pretty clearly what Little Women is. The non-chronological storytelling was a bit confusing but it had nothing to do with my assertion that it's a 'nothing' movie, and since I listed it as one of the best nominees, it should be clear that 'nothing' movies aren't bad by any means. I really liked the movie, and your criticism is so remarkably off-base I don't know if you're just really bad at reading comprehension or if you're overcompensating for some weird hangups you have external to this conversation. as in, I guess you heard people complaining about the nonlinear progression of the narrative and...somehow...assumed that because I said something you vaguely saw as negative (it wasn't), that this was the reason? Please don't project your hangups onto me. I loved the movie and felt it deserved more praise than it got; its status in my mind as a 'nothing' movie does nothing to deter me from enjoying it and the nonlinear narrative had nothing to do with that assessment. |
Oooooooh...I misunderstood. Sorry about that. 
