I just wanted to say that, I think one of the main problem with this site is the way articles are organized and presented. There are great articles on vgchartz, but these well written articles tend to get buried quickly by a mass of junk filler articles. I understand that short two paragraph news articles also help drive traffic to the site, but the more substantial articles need better visibility. If an official writer takes the time to write up a six or seven paragraph article, such as a game review, it should be visible on the front page of the site for at least a month. What is happening right now though, is that those articles tend to get buried in a week or less. After they get buried the only way to find those longer articles is to make two or three clicks into the site, which most users just won't bother with. For example: How many of you managed to see this review? http://www.vgchartz.com/article/442143/grayland-pc/ I didn't. It was taken off the front page so fast, that I never knew it existed until I manually went into the all articles section. And I only did that to prove a point in this post.
I think the solution to this is to emulate the way Destructoid handles larger and smaller articles. Things like reviews, or popular articles automatically tend to get bumped up. Or they get their own space outside of the normal article feed. Vgchartz already has that in a way.
For example: You can see here that there are three big articles with their own space on the site. They are the Ys review, the Top 50 Games article, and the YoY Sales article. This is great, but I think it needs to be expanded. I think instead of having one article with a large picture (Ys Review in this case), followed by two other articles with a smaller picture, it should be expanded so that we get one article with a large picture and 8-10 articles with the smaller pictures, like the Top 50 Games article.
What I'm basically saying here is that the "latest stories" section of the site is overcrowding the more substantial articles.
Another good solution to this would be implementing a system that bumps articles based on how many views or how many comments they have. If an article doesn't have very many views or comments, then it should die for being a poorly written phoned in article, same as any bad thread in these forums.
Oh, and finally I think Zergnet just has to go. It used to be an interesting way to find good gaming sites, but over the past few years it has devolved into clickbait.
Edit: Changed some things, because I realized that articles weren't getting buried quite as quickly as I thought.
Essay Pro