animegaming said:
Azzanation said:
Where are these facts you speak of? I don't want to hear they were low on funds without actually knowing what that means.. Nintendo were also in a space where they were struggling and they still managed to fund there own stuff to get back on there feat. Sorry I don't just believe they were too low on funds to fund one of there major IPs that wouldn't have taken a lot of funds to create in the first place. Anyone can cry poor to defend the act of money hatting.
Can I argue that Crystal Dynamics timed exclusive with the X1 was also a troubled studio? No I wont use that card because I simply don't believe it. Capcom would have made SFV regardless, they just did it quicker because a pay check came there way.
|
https://www.dualshockers.com/capcom-only-has-152-in-their-bank-account-plans-to-invest-more-into-the-dlc-market/
|
Only 152m in their bank account and they can't afford to make Street Fighter V? Lol, I'm sorry but this is nonsense. Street Fighter is literally the safest title they released the whole gen sans Monster Hunter. They could absolutely finance it, its not some crazy AAA new IP which cost 60m and 4 years of production. Especially over whatever else was in the pipeline which was seemingly console exclusive (Dead Rising-MS), Deep Down (Sony).
They were playing it safe, which is not a crime but lets not say they couldn't afford to make SFV
