So does this then mean......
PS3 launch = "enormous impact and undue economic harm on the video game ecosystem”
If PS5 and XBSX were going to be priced at $399, then this wouldn't have specifically been that big of an issue. If they were going to be $499, then this would certainly be of considerable concern. If either was going to be higher yet, then, cancelled?
A $499 Switch Pro, $599 PS5, and $599-$699 XBSX would absolutely fall under, “enormous impact and undue economic harm[…]on the entire video game ecosystem.”
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.
