| JRPGfan said: Thats Qualcomm..... not nvidia.. However that GPU is crowned as the "most effecient graphics core, in the world" (currently).
|
Oh, I know that Adreno is Qualcomm. I wasn't trying to state it was Nvidia. Honestly, I was purposefully avoiding using Qualcomm at first for a better like for like comparison when discussing the Switch. Also, I'm not suggesting using Apple chips, I'm merely stating the current power capabilities of mobile technology right now.
Also, I believe you are mistaking the Adreno 650 with the 640. The 640's Gtex is 28.1/s vs Xbox One's 40.9/s, Gpixel fill is 9.4/s vs 13.65/s, and memory band 34.13 GB/s vs 68.22 GB/s. 640 is 900-1037 GFLOPS vs 1.3 TFLOPS on Xbox One. The 650 supposedly offers 25% improved performance. If we match that across the board it's 11.75 Gpixel/s, 35.12Gtex/s, (memory band we know is 44.0GB/s), and ~1.2TFLOPS.
| JRPGfan said: Nintendo never uses bleeding edge technology. |
The difference between what was argued is what was POSSIBLE not what will actually happen. In a previous comment I already identified that Nintendo isn't an industry leader in power performance, and haven't been for 19 years. I'm not expecting PS4 Pro level performance, I'm merely stating that in four years it might be technologically possible. However, you are erroneous to assume that the max we would receive would be a console only as capable as a base PS4 in four years while docked. The Adreno 865 is capable of 2.1 TFLOPS and the device it's on consumes around 65W.







