By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Slownenberg said:
SKMBlake said:

So your points:

- do it, end of story

-it may be inaccurate, but still

-it is not scentifically correct

-the other way around "doesn't make sense" despite being accurate

-there is no difference overall

My point is no one cares about the technicality of the calendar when talking about decades. Everyone understands decades refers to 0-9, all that matters is the digit in the tens place cuz that is what we are talking about when talking about decades. End of discussion. Now what was this thread about again haha

That's were you are wrong, and why we're having this debate in the first place.