By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SpokenTruth said:
Signalstar said:

Sort of how Nintendo shelled out big for Monster Hunter to be on 3DS rather than Vita?

Prove that.  We'll wait.

Evidence that Nintendo Shelled Out Money to Capcom to Have Monster Hunter on 3DS rather than Vita:

1) A Monster Hunter game was shown running on Vita hardware at the handhelds initial reveal in Japan when it was still called NGP.

2) Nintendo created and released the Circle Pad Pro for the 3DS with Monster Hunter as the marquee game in mind. The Vita already had 2 analog stick, therefore it already had optimal controls for Monster Hunter.

3) Monster Hunter released on the 3DS, with bundled special editions, the same day as Vita's launch day in Japan. It was clearly meant to counteract the Vita. The 3DS handily outsold the Vita that week.

4) To date no Monster Hunter Game has been released for the Vita.

Evidence that Sony Shelled Out Money to Capcom to Prevent Monster Hunter on Switch:

0) There is no evidence that Sony shelled out money to Capcom to Prevent Monster Hunter on Switch.

Evidence that Sony Did Not Shell Out Money to Capcom to Prevent Monster Hunter on Switch:

1) Monster Hunter World has always been announced as a multi-platform game. It is available for the Xbox One and PC. Why would Sony allow this if it just wanted to keep the game off Switch. We have seen what it looks like when Sony wants a game Console exclusive with Capcom: Eg: Street Figther V.

This next one is very important...

2) A Monster Hunter game has already been released on Switch. It is called Monster Hunter Generations Ultimate. If Sony paid Capcom to keep MH off Switch they should ask for their money back.

So there is way more evidence that my conclusion is likely and almost zero evidence that his conclusion is even possible. Yet you only asked me for proof...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1gWECYYOSo

Please Watch/Share this video so it gets shown in Hollywood.