CuCabeludo said:
It would be a total disaster. Console is something you plug a game and play, not managing game files between inactive storage(slow HDD) and active storage(SSD). |
Well as far as I'm concerned, there's only two main ways to go about this, if they are going to approach it this way. Either:
1. They force you to use their own proprietary SSD carts, which as you stated, could be a nightmare due to lesser storage for unreasonable costs.
or
2. They give you the option to use an existing, cheaper, or much larger external HDD, but you have the nightmare of unreasonable data transfers.
One way or another it doesn't look great on them, but one way allows for an extra option, even if it sucks. The only way it looks reasonable on them, using this approach, is if the SSD's are very close, if not cheaper than comparable off the shelf SSD storage.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.







