TheMisterManGuy said: But according to people on the internet, that's apparently not good enough. The thinking is that because this is a new character-driven multiplayer game like Splatoon, it needed to do as well as, if not better than Splatoon on the first try. |
"People on the internet" are still discussing if ARMS was a success or a failure? Or is it just you?
Has anything changed since your last thread about it? http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=238790&page=1
I'm sure ARMS was quite profitable for Nintendo, but why do you feel the urge to prove its success?