But according to people on the internet, that's apparently not good enough. The thinking is that because this is a new character-driven multiplayer game like Splatoon, it needed to do as well as, if not better than Splatoon on the first try.
"People on the internet" are still discussing if ARMS was a success or a failure? Or is it just you?
Has anything changed since your last thread about it? http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=238790&page=1
I'm sure ARMS was quite profitable for Nintendo, but why do you feel the urge to prove its success?