By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SpokenTruth said:
EricHiggin said:

Second accuser

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/26/politics/who-is-deborah-ramirez/index.html

Third accuser

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/26/politics/julie-swetnick-allegation-kavanaugh/index.html

Fourth...

They'll run out of fingers eventually, and then they won't be able to deny it!

Hello there false equivalence.


A. Extra accusations in a Supreme Court nomination hearing.

B. Extra whistleblowers in a presidential impeachment case.

The failure of extra A to defeat a Supreme Court nomination is not predictive for failure of extra B to impeach a president.

Goodbye incorrect assumption.