DonFerrari said:
Well that is why I said most. Because unless they were also thinking of killing people and/or controlling birth to keep population reduced the natural course is population growth until stagnation due to cost of living/comfort of having 0-2 child per couple. On most developed countries we are having slow reduction of population along time but the rest of the globe is still growing population. I would say we probably will hit 15 or even 20B people before reduction becomes a natural occurence worldwide. |
I don't disagree. Based on what you just said, which isn't out of the question, you can't help but wonder if they do want to control the pop somehow, unless they are in it for the long game, like triple overtime long.
Fairly expensive stunt to pull just for a gag me thinks.
