By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sundin13 on 30 September 2019
Edit Thread
EricHiggin said:
sundin13 said:

Putting aside several strawmen, again, all I am asking of you is to actually make a functional argument.

As for your video, who cares that Biden doesn't answer a trite question that he's likely answered 100x before? This seems to be one of your famous metaphors that makes no sense...

All I'm presenting is a vid for anyone to watch if they so wish.

As for your want for an explanation to start a verbal argument, there isn't enough evidence to prove he did something wrong beyond reasonable doubt, so it's an argument that couldn't be won, so why have it? No different than the Trump Ukraine call. But hey, knock yourself out.

I look forward to new posts that only give facts that are without question undeniable.

I am not sure why you brought "reasonable doubt" into this. That isn't what this discussion has ever been about. Debates on forums shouldn't be held to the same standard as criminal proceedings. I don't think that has ever really been a foundational part of persuasive arguments and it is certainly not something that I have suggested. Again, I am simply asking for an argument. As stated before, that requires but three simple phases: Hypothesis, evidence and explanation. These facets remain fundamental even when discussing purely subjective matters.

You are acting like expecting an argument within a discussion on politics is some radical demand. It isn't. It is the bare minimum for a discussion. These strange implications are wholly unnecessary.