jason1637 said:
No. The last primary wad DC on June 14th. |
That's not relevant; Bernie only continued with the DC primary because he promised to, the race was already lost, and he lost the DC primary spectacularly; largely because its outcome was irrelevant and voters wanted to show support to Clinton. Clinton won a majority and the popular vote on June 7th, and Elizabeth Warren's endorsement was announced on June 9th.
What you're trying to argue is that there was some difference between Warren's endorsement and that of Bernie Sanders, which is purely fictional and a blatantly hypocritical narrative. The only difference is that Bernie was later.
I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.







