By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
o_O.Q said:
sundin13 said:

Which is why we institute laws such as this to distinguish what information you can and cannot use when making certain decisions. Race is considered a "protected class" and as such, you cannot decide against hiring someone due to race. On the other hand "intelligence" is not considered a protected class, so you are allowed to decide against hiring someone due to college grades.

Your other complaints such as "female waxers" are considered within the law under the "Bona Fide Occupational Qualification" provisions of anti-discrimination laws, which essentially state that if a certain quality is fundamental to a position, the employer may discriminate based upon that quality.

" Race is considered a "protected class" and as such, you cannot decide against hiring someone due to race."

and now so is gender which is why a trans woman demanded that she have her scrotum waxed

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9607639/trans-woman-jessica-yaniv-waxing-complaint/

First of all, that ignores all of my primary rebuttals to your post. It is little more than a "Look over here" rebuttal which seeks to distract from the conversation instead of confront it.

Second, a resounding "Who cares?".

Third, pointing to open litigation establishes nothing. Stupid people sue for stupid reasons literally every day. That doesn't mean we should throw out laws. From what I've read, it seems those handling the case agree that this is stupid, so it seems highly unlikely that it will result in anything worth complaining about.