I just don't agree. A game is an opinion, based mostly on fun. If a reviewer thinks a game is a 10, so be it. Adding objective criteria to a subjective process is a paradox.
I mean should RDR2, TLoU, Spider-Man all be dinged for not having a two player couch coop experience? We should have all criteria (including two player) included in the review process, right? Or does it make more sense to accept a two player coop mode makes sense for say Mario Odyssey but not for Spider-Man? Thus it would be unfair to hold Spider-Man to standards in which the game was never intended to meet.
God of War; 6/10. Minus 1 for no couch coop. Minus 1 for no online play. Minus 1 for not being child friendly. Minus 1 for no motion controls. Right??? For God of War to be highly ranked, it has to have ALL gaming criteria.
Last edited by Chrkeller - on 30 July 2019|
i7-13700k |
|
Vengeance 32 gb |
|
RTX 4090 Ventus 3x E OC |
Switch OLED
