BraLoD said:
Chrkeller said:
I completely disagree, Nintendo simply focuses on different technology. The problem is you are viewing technology exclusively as better graphics. From a technology perspective Nintendo focuses on ways to play. Off the top of my head Nintendo developed shoulder buttons, analogs, rumble controllers, 4 controller ports, multiple screens, motion controls and now a hybrid console. All that is technology, just not 'better graphics.'
Personally I love Sony and Nintendo, what makes owning both such a great experience is the fact they focus on different things. Nintendo doesn't need to be another "me too" console. The Xbox X is a power beast, too bad MS has little to no exclusive content. At the end of the day Nintendo develops software, than creates hardware to play their games. This is different view compared to Sony/MS.
For those who think there is a Nintendo bias, do you think there is a Naughty Dog bias because almost everything they release is reviewed 90+? I'm guessing not.
Either way, there is no Nintendo bias. Nintendo makes superb titles.
|
And I don't see how does any of that goes against Nintendo having fallen behind in technology, which was the statement you went against.
Oh and about ND, any reason their games shouldn't be getting that reception?
|
We will have to agree to disagree. Technology isn't graphics. The Switch has technology we have not seen in the gaming world before. If the Switch has new technology (which clearly it does), then by default Nintendo isn't behind on technology, but rather in a different direction. Either way, we clearly disagree.
ND, thanks for proving my point. When games get reviewed well on their console of choice, they deserve the recognition.... on other consoles, bias. See the convenience there? If not, cool. No skin and all that.
