coolbeans said:
Well, what's the real criteria here then? B/c as far as blocking, composition, visual storytelling, how to 'direct' actors, etc. Breen has none of that going for him. The 'it's so bad it's good' criteria (which I find a bit dubious with his first film) is something to consider for entertainment purposes; however, being notoriously bad would still net you in the 'worst' category. |
But, he does entertain his audience. Sure, not in the way he hoped to. Plus, I'd give it to Uwe Boll just for the fact that his movies were mainly a tax scam.