NintendoCM said:
There is a reason I put renaming in quotes. I fully read the article, I'm merely equating the article into effective terms. They are attempting to make fossil fuels seem less damaging than they are, which is *extremely* dangerous to efforts to combat climate change. This article is simply highlighting the issues with our DoE and how our country is leagues behind on this imperative fight due to the DoE and the Trump Administration. |
The DOE name in itself is a problem if you go deep enough. Look how long it's been around and how long fossil fuels have been said to be a problem. Is the "Department of Energy" really the best name for it, or is it just the most politically correct?