By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
EricHiggin on 23 April 2019
Edit Thread
The_Liquid_Laser said:
EricHiggin said:

Well if MS offers an affordable next gen system and a much higher performing elite model at launch, that would be something new and different. Also, I believe Nin and Nvidia have both said they have a 10 year plan/deal, and with the Switch Mini and Switch Pro rumors, how long before Switch is no longer considered new and different? What if PS drops a Switch competitor (aside from their home console(s)) during that same old, same old Switch phase in a couple of years? What about VR?

Offering multiple SKUs of the same console is not new.  Both PS3 and Wii U did it and neither got good results from it. 

When will Switch no longer be considered new and different?  Generation 10

What about VR?  Depends on if it's bundled with the PS5 or not.  If it isn't then it won't matter.  If it is, then it will be a big mistake.

Multiple SKU's of considerably different performance overall, not just differences in storage.

So if Nin doesn't come out with something other than Switch 2 then they are likely to fail since Switch 2 will just be more of the same?

Depends if it's bundled or not? If it isn't then it won't matter and if it is it will be a mistake? So your saying VR sucks or is useless regardless?



PS1   - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.

PS2  - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.

PS3   - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.

PS4   - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.

PRO  -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.

PS5   - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.

PRO  -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.