By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LudicrousSpeed said:
Chris Hu said:

You need to do some more research they actually never found any nude images of children in his house the only thing they found is a tabletop book with semi nude boys in it and that book was a best seller so many people actually own that same book. 

lol they found photos of nude and partially clothed kids in sexually suggestive poses and even photos of nude/partially clothed adults in sexual poses but kids faces were put on the adult bodies. Stuff that is fucking creepy but at the time wasn’t classified as actual child pornography. 

Not going to post in here any more, MJ apologists are never going to listen to logic or reason.

First bolded: please give us a good source on that if you have it and i mean a source and not a newsarticle.At the time stuff like that was not classified as child pornography and even now it would not be classified as child pornography and it is not even close but i wont say it isnt twisted.

Second bolded: Dont use the apologists term to think you have the moral highground,there are lots of people who just stand in-between.