Machiavellian said:
Are you telling me that you purchase every single piece of DLC content for every game you buy?? I still am not sure where you are going with your thoughts. If a game has no DLC, so what, thats the decision of the person who made the game. Why would one developer's decision means anything else for another. I purchase a game on the main game alone. DLC never comes into the equation on if I will buy a game. If the main game is complete in my eyes it gets my money, I care very little about the extra content. If the season pass means so much to you then yes you should not purchase the game. Even with that said, I am not sure if that really has anything to do with what we are talking about. You are basically saying the price is to steep for you then anything else. |
Why does a game need so much DLC that one cannot feasibly purchase it all if they chose? What's wrong with wanting all of a game's content? And, to answer your question, yes. The exceptions to that are DoA5, and Street Fighte V. I want my games complete, and the wrong message is 93 dollars for a single season pass. That's insane. There's more content in the base game.
Extra characters are a part of the game. I don't know how else to explain that fighting game characters in a fighting game being locked off is a major detriment to those that don't have them. You can't practice against characters you don't own. It's like playing a game of cards, but the face cards are DLC. It's ridiculous. You don't make important parts of the game like that DLC.
I already brought up how the DLC pricing is no where near equilibrium. Because of that, I'm not buying the game at all. If the DLC was cheaper, I would have gotten the game, regardless of when or if I got the DLC.
I do not like what this company is doing. 60 dollars is not going to give me a complete game. I don't want to pay so much for a beta. I will spend my money elsewhere. Plain and simple as that.