By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mar1217 said:
JRPGfan said:

Well I see AAA games on PS4 level as being $60m+.
Double AA games are less than half of that, and A level games again are like a $5-10m.

Lets say Nintendo spent $10m to make all the various kits of Labo
And then the cardboard costs with each kit is like 2$.

$10m (R&D) + 2$ x 2m kits (cardboard) = $14m:

Lets say they sold 2m kits of 80$ = $160m revenue.
Now the shops take their cuts, and theres shipping & packageing, but its very apparent that nintendo just takes the vast marjority and banks it.

Ei. they have heavy profits on it.

i don't think subjective calculus with arbitrary numbers make for a great compelling argument.

I agree that subjective calculus with arbitrary numbers ain't the greatest. But, were on a forum about sales where we deal with estimated or outright made up numbers all the time.  So, let's play it out a bit more anyway.....

$10m R&D
 2 million fancy boxes, at several dollars each, let's call it $5 each, so that's another $10m
Shipping from China to ports around the world, then shipping from ports to distribution centers, then shipping from distribution centers to stores has to be another $15or so per unit (they're not small), gives us another $30m.  That's $50m of baked in costs, by the time the thing is sitting on a retailer's shelf

Now, we have a larger box that takes up a lot of shelf space.  Retailers take smallish margins (typically 25%) on games because they're easy inventory to handle.  But, Labo is not a game in that way.  It takes up about 30 times the shelf/warehouse space.  It also isn't something that drives accessory sales.  So, the retailer has to get paid for that space.  My retail experience tells me they want a 40% margin.   That's $64m of the total revenue that went to retailers. 

So, we have $64m of retailer margin, $50m of costs to design, produce, package, and distribute.  That's a total of $114m, out of the $160m revenue.  That leaves $46mm for Nintendo.  The problem is though, we haven't yet accounted for any marketing other than packaging.  Nobody buys the thing without some advertising, and/or other marketing expense.  Millions more were spent there (though, arguably, they didn't spend enough in this area).  So, while my (admittedly, very rough) estimates lead me to believe that Labo has been profitable for Nintendo, they also lead me to believe that profit was not huge, and probably not large enough to justify a company taking its eye off of its core business.