By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
EricHiggin on 09 January 2019
Edit Thread
DonFerrari said:
John2290 said:

I'd be disappointed if PS5 proper wasn't aiming for 4k, 60fps at €400 from launch with exceptions at 4k, 30/45fps being the third party games. 4k is a given but I think with deep learning tech and a need for 120fps for VR, 60 fps should easily attained if they have invested correctly in the VR tech. So lets hope the ps5 is a VR machine.

I like and have VR, but not sure the 3M sales will make they give extra attention to VR on PS5 HW. certainly the better CPU we expect may give "indie level" and VR cartoonish graphics 120fps on good graphic output. And considering one side pretty cartoon versus other side ugly realistic (due to basically 4x more processing) I would take the first, but I believe we will have pristine and better than PS360 level of graphic on 120 fps VR games next gen for PS5.

$499 with the VR breakout box baked into the console, making the VR SKU itself cheaper. Pricing could vary depending on subsidy. You could have a $399 Pro console, $299 base hybrid, and $199 streaming box.



PS1   - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.

PS2  - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.

PS3   - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.

PS4   - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.

PRO  -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.

PS5   - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.

PRO  -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.