drinkandswim said:
You haven't proven me wrong on anything yet. My prediction was for next gen. But good luck! |
It is just plain impossible for the "best" portable solution to be better than the "best" "desktop" solution. It's a very simple equation on power, price, battery.
Why or how do you think you would make PS5/X2 equivalent portable, with good battery life and similarly priced?
Because I will tell you that for it to be portable you need to consume less energy so if it is a similar architeture you'll have less performance, if it is a better architeture you will have bigger cost.
So you can expect Switch 2 to have X1 or PS4 level processing power, but at that time PS5/X2 will have about 8-10 times the processing power.
Switch doesn't have same level of AAA games on graphical level nor will Switch 2. As much as PS4/X1 nor PS5/X2 will have same graphical power as upper class gaming rigs.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







