By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
drinkandswim said:
zorg1000 said:

And you have been proven wrong on nearly everything you have said in this thread yet still keep arguing.

You haven't proven me wrong on anything yet. My prediction was for next gen. But good luck!

It is just plain impossible for the "best" portable solution to be better than the "best" "desktop" solution. It's a very simple equation on power, price, battery.

Why or how do you think you would make PS5/X2 equivalent portable, with good battery life and similarly priced?

Because I will tell you that for it to be portable you need to consume less energy so if it is a similar architeture you'll have less performance, if it is a better architeture you will have bigger cost.

So you can expect Switch 2 to have X1 or PS4 level processing power, but at that time PS5/X2 will have about 8-10 times the processing power.

Switch doesn't have same level of AAA games on graphical level nor will Switch 2. As much as PS4/X1 nor PS5/X2 will have same graphical power as upper class gaming rigs.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."