Azzanation on 14 December 2018
| curl-6 said: This isn't one of those cases though. Nobody's crucifying the game over a 1 frame per second dip. The reason its catching flak is because it is quite possibly one of the most technically atrocious games to see a console release since the N64 era. It is simply not acceptable to charge $50 for something so massively below par. This isn't 1994. |
Its a common tread with sandbox games. Even Fallout76 which was made by a AAA developer cannot master the art.
Ark should not be sold $50 i agree there.
Keep in mind current games release broken normally and get hot fixed over time. Where as a broken game in the 90s was not repairable. All for the sameprice.
