The reason the switch is barely starting and sales will explode next few years +250m LTD

[kirby007]

thismeintiel said:

JRPGfan said:

Vega 56, is better than a stock Geforce 1070, at 4k.
if your okay with just stable 30+ fps, theres alot of current games you can run at 4k with Very-high / Ultra settings with that on a pc.

With a console, where overhead is lowered and things can be better optimised...
something like that would be better than most people's gameing PC (except for those very high end builds).

 

https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2017-amd-radeon-rx-vega-56-review_9

 

3840x2160 (4K)	RX Vega 56	R9 Fury X	GTX 1070	GTX 1080	GTX 1080 Ti
Assassin's Creed Unity, Ultra High, FXAA	25.8	23.3	25.9	33.0	45.4
Ashes of the Singularity, Extreme, 0x MSAA, DX12	54.4	48.8	48.7	60.2	76.8
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare, Max, Post-AA	70.4	60.0	58.5	75.3	96.6
Crysis 3, Very High, SMAA T2x	31.4	32.1	31.9	40.3	53.3
The Division, Ultra, SMAA	36.8	33.3	32.1	40.3	52.3
Far Cry Primal, Ultra, SMAA	38.6	35.1	33.8	42.3	55.2
Ghost Recon Wildlands, Ultra, TAA	26.3	18.6	23.3	29.6	37.3
Hitman, Ultra, SMAA, DX12	53.1	48.4	48.4	60.9	75.9
Rise of the Tomb Raider, Very High, High Textures, SMAA, DX12	39.6	34.0	36.1	46.2	60.5
The Witcher 3, Ultra, Post AA, No HairWorks	41.1	37.6	37.4	47.6	64.1

^ this is with early drivers for the Vega (launch review, vs kinda matured nvidia drivers)
Real world performance today is probably much better for the vega.

I doubt next gen will be as "weak" as the 56.  At least not the PS5.  PS5 is using Navi, which should have some gains in performance over Vega.  And if the rumors are true, it was designed to be cheap competitor to the 1080/1080Ti, which is where I think the PS5 will lie.  I'm also expecting something more along the lines of a Ryzen 7.

@ OP

Good job at lowballing the numbers.  More like 350M+.

Thats the spirit! Good for you