By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Lonely_Dolphin said:
JWeinCom said:

No, I'm not naive.  I asked you to clarify twice, and you did not either time.

If there are other reasons, then you cannot base objective value based solely on number of Pokemon.  So... you invalidated your own argument.

Yes, you thought that was even a possibility hence you asking. I'll be straight up, I was too dumbfounded to answer lol.

Oh you still think that somehow. Perhaps disingenuous is more apt than naive. I guess I could see how you got confused after Curl n Super shifted the focus specifically to the number of Pokemon, but eh sure, I invalidated my own argument. That don't change the facts so whatever.


"Again I have to ask, is enjoyment of the game going to be based solely on the number of Pokemon? If not, what other factors should one take into account?"

Can you explain how this question was in any way dumbfounding?  Can you explain how giving you an opportunity to clarify your opinion is in any way disingenuous?  

Last edited by JWeinCom - on 30 November 2018