By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Lonely_Dolphin said:
JWeinCom said:

Value is inherently subjective, particularly when you are describing it with money, which is not anything stable.

But, hey, let's go with your logic.  

Pokemon Go has 417 Pokemon.  For 0 dollars.  

If the value of a Pokemon game is solely on the number of Pokemon, then Pokemon go is objectively the most valuable game.  Not just by a little, but by a literally infinite amount.  By comparison, Sun and Moon are objectively worthless and clearly a despicable cash grab.  I mean, 802 Pokemon for 40 dollars, vs 417 for ZERO DOLLARS?

Pokemon Go is an amazing value.  Sun and Moon is a cash grab.  Fact. 

Objective value is most certainly a thing, i.e. a 2lb bag of Twix is straight up more valuable than a 1lb bag for the same price.

Ha, you're really so naive to think I'm saying that's the sole reason. That's just the biggest point is all.

Alrighty then, one is free to have that opinion. Plenty of people think this series as a whole is a cash grab, and that's perfectly ok.

No, I'm not naive.  I asked you to clarify twice, and you did not either time.

If there are other reasons, then you cannot base objective value based solely on number of Pokemon.  So... you invalidated your own argument.