curl-6 said:
The Switch isn't high end though, it never was, from day 1 it was technically behind the competition. People aren't buying it for its graphics, two of its biggest sellers are Wii U games. |
You're both right,
People aren't buying it for the graphics, but people ARE buying it because it's a compelling product.
And Nintendo is going to have to maintain that, otherwise they run into the generational arch where they sell up to year 2 or 3, and then in decline for 3, 4, 5, and 6, and then do it all over again from scratch.
Putting in a new graphical chip is an easy win, and then rather than declining from 15, to 12, to 10, to 6m, they can keep up the 20m per year level, and perhaps even increase it in 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and so on. We don't have to say goodbye the Switch and say hello to the Switch U, we can keep our Switches, new consumers get their Switch 2s which are more compelling purchases than ours, and third party devs get increased sales... as do first party devs.
This may be the first time this is possible with Nintendo hardware given the nature of the Switch... which is built with hardware that is generally made to be upgraded in this fashion.
I also think the next hardware would do best to launch the same day as Pokemon, with some other big first party game not far off that date: maybe Animal Crossing? (I would actually prefer Animal Crossing earlier, but business is business).
I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.