By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JWeinCom said:
Lonely_Dolphin said:

So you're disagreeing with a fact then? That you get 800 Pokemon for $40 vs. 150 Pokemon for $60 is not an idea nor just another way to see it but a fact. Whether or not you experience the 800 Pokemon, they are still in the game thus relevant in a discussion about value. Well atleast you kinda agree, that's good enough. :L

No he is not disagreeing with a fact.

Denial it is then, but even if that were true Let's Go is still a worse value, $60 for 153 Pokemon vs. $40 for 200~ Pokemon so mute point. Also, of course anything can be any level of value to anyone personally, hence I'm obviously talking objective value. To me Let's Go isn't worth the dirt on my shoes, but I acknowledge the fact that it is still has some of what you'd expect out of a mainline Pokemon and brings some new features so a price of $0 is just wrong. At the same time, so to is the price of $60 as it has less content than cheaper titles. If Let's Go were $20 the game would still be worthless to me but I would no longer call it a cash grab.