By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Lonely_Dolphin said:
curl-6 said:

Looking at Let's Go's sales, clearly a lot of people are quite happy to pay $60 for 152 Pokemon. 

If there really was a linear relationship between number of Pokemon and perceived value, then 20% as many Pokemon should net 20% as many sales, yet clearly Let's Go has done far better than that.

The game could sell to every person in the universe, but the fact that it has less content at a higher price will remain unchanged.

Quantity of content and value/quality aren't necessarily one and the same though, is all I meant.