Pokemon Company: Let's Go sold 3 million in first 3 days

[GhaudePhaede010]

BraLoD said:

Nautilus said:

The exact word I wanted to use was "salt", but I felt like the sentence would be too agreesive and I would get a warning/ban over something that wasnt worth it.

 

Now for your question, the denial/salt was meant to point out you trying to downplay Lets Go success and calling it a free to play game when it was reviewed well.Dont get me wrong, I dont like the direction of that game either, but your sentence just didnt feel like it came from the right place, to put it midly.

I'm not downplaying it, I'm giving my opinion.

I want people to support the type of games I like, as actual pokemon games, so they can keep getting made instead of this kinds of cash grab, that's about it.

Your second statement is simply pathetic. It is quite possible that people can support both types of games - if both types of games are quality. Hell, the titles could pull two different audiences which means one's success does not detract the other's success in the least. New Super Mario Bros. existed but did that stop Mario Galaxy or its sequel from existing? I do not enjoy 3D Mario titles so should I want people to support 2D games instead of 3D games? Trying to take options away from the consumer (which is what your mentality leads to, ultimately) is selfish and backward. Especially since the way you are approaching this subject is objectively incorrect.

Why in the world would any company stop making one successful product to make a different successful product? Why would they not just make... ...I know this will sound crazy... ...TWO SUCCESSFUL PRODUCTS. You gotta extend your reach a bit. That selfishness is served salty.