Pemalite said:
Spoken like a true conservative. |
Some renewables would have been fine, at more affordable government payouts, or shorter span payouts as they are also reduced in turn with renewable purchasing and installation costs, should have been the plan, which I wouldn't exactly deem a conservative viewpoint. They were way to progressive about it, and should have been more Liberal.
|
Our Liberals are sick of the status quo too, just not when it comes to anything really important. They focus on the little things and mostly ignore the problems that impact the most. Mary Jane being legalized recently should help bring in some extra money, but what are they going to spend it on is another question. Our Gov has made attempts to break up the big monopolies, but has only made small dents in them at best. When it comes to telecommunications that's one area they don't like to mess with.
Pemalite said:
Vast countries like Australia, Canada etc' cannot really afford to sit around and expect a company to do this... It is bad business sense so shit will stagnate. |
They recently gave some money to an organization that is looking to try and work with all the internet co's and get fiber laid over a vast majority rural area in Ontario, but they've had the money for years and are just getting to the point where they are finding out where the existing infrastructure is and who can help them with the installation, so maybe construction could start next year, and is supposed to finish 2021-2022. Much of the wait apparently is because the big co's have held off as long as possible as to helping out with information and deciding how much they want to help install, knowing they are going to probably lose millions of customers when this happens. That is only the first planned phase based on the money they were able to attain from the Gov, which is basically just to strengthen the backbone of the existing system. The full plan says if they can continue to receive Gov funding, that rural homes will start to see fiber around 2030, and the last homes will see it by 2040. Private money and ISP's that aren't part of that program may speed up that time line ever so slightly, but ya, 2040 before some people get anything better than 5.0mbps basically.
Pemalite said:
The irony is... I am still on half century old copper. |
Near the odd forward thinking town or the big cities they can get 50mbps dsl, but once that drops to around 4.0mbps over distance they don't do anything. Everyone passed that point is stuck with dial up still unless there's another large enough town nearby with a direct fiber run to it already. That's the only reason we can get 5.0mbps here. Not far passed us everyone has no option but 56k dial up or 2mbps wireless or 20mbps satellite (which is unaffordable, unreliable, low capped, and 10mbps on average).
Pemalite said:
We rolled out fixed wireless here for the outskirts of the town that happily hits 50Mbps down with unlimited data caps, fantastic technology for rural areas. |
Near Niagara Falls there is a company that installed some wireless towers and offers 50mbps, but the while I don't remember the data caps and prices exactly, they were some of the worst I've ever seen in Canada. That's what happens without competition and options though.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.







