Hiku said: Sorry, there's something I've edited into my post twice now, after you hit reply, and you missed it both times because of my late timing. lol As for people being entitled to free stuff, it's not really that people have an inherent right to those things. It comes down to two things. 1.) We recognize that there are people in our society that need to be taken care of. And whom no one will take care of, unless we step up as a collective. |
So now your saying because the gun ratio shouldn't change much but the amount of violent acts will, that it's really not the guns fault? I would have to agree for the most part.
Well personally, if you were around something that is known to cause cancer, and you got cancer, and you couldn't afford the treatment to fight that cancer, I'd say that's not really the systems fault, it's your own. Now if you had no idea that you could get cancer in the situation that caused it, then that's a little different, but that's also why people are supposed to have a rainy day fund and why that should be enough to allow you to borrow on top of that if you need more expensive help.
The majority rarely pass up anything free. I'm sure if everyone was offered free food they would all agree it should be a right as well. Having a right to speech makes sense because all it really requires is a right to life, which is also a major topic up for debate these days. Healthcare as a right in terms of it being free for everyone, like free contraceptives lets say, makes me think of having gun ownership being considered a right in terms of guns being free for everyone. Feel like you need protection? Here's a free gun. Not sure why people would see a difference in that, even though they certainly would.
The way I see it, if I don't pay my share of the fire taxes, if I call and my place is on fire, nobody bothers to show up. It's like not having insurance on some things. If they are destroyed for whatever reason, then tough luck. That's your choice though, and it should be in every way. The problem with this, is that many of the rich won't buy in, and the middle class and poor will only be able to afford mediocre solutions to things they want like a fire dept or healthcare.
The problem with this idea of socialist everything, is that over time, the smarter, harder working people either eventually slowly stop caring as much which leads to the economy slowly stagnating, or they leave and go elsewhere, to where they can do what they want. There is a reason why people like Elon Musk went from Africa to Canada to America. Musk could never be anything close to what he's created now in Africa or Canada, and that's certainly a big reason why his companies are American. Now since it seems he wants to help society as much as possible, that's great that he's aloud to do that, but you can almost guarantee, if you started taxing him in a manner in which he can now only afford to run Tesla or The Boring Co or SpaceX, and he had to choose, you can bet he keeps Space X because he's not giving up Mars, and that's going to do the least for humanity out of those 3 companies.
"I was hungry and you gave me something to eat. I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink. And behold, now I'm all lazy and entitled. You shouldn't have done that." This is why continually giving away free things and calling them rights becomes a problem, because it's true. Most people tend to get lazier when they are treated to good and the rich people paying for much of that start caring less as well, and the entire economy slowly suffers.