By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pokoko said:
Madword said:

Me too.

3 Was fantastic, would lap up a remaster of that.

New Vegas I found harder to get into.

Fallout 4, that settlement stuff was just rubbish busy work and totally moved away from what's great about Fallout which is exploration. If they'd made the settlement stuff easier and less like Minecraft I think the game would have been much better for it.

Just not interested in 76, not a fan of MP games.

That makes absolutely no sense at all.  Fallout 4 had ten times the amount of stuff to explore and find than New Vegas.  More than that, actually, by a long shot.  I'd found and done everything New Vegas had to offer by level 50 but was nowhere close to finding everything in Fallout 4 by level 100.  Anyone complaining about "exploration" in Fallout 4 probably just played it like a linear game and went where the prompts told them and found a tiny fraction of the total content.  As for settlement stuff, all you had to do was not do it.  As simple as that.  Calling something "rubbish" that many, many other people love, and which is 99% optional, doesn't make much sense, either.  Leave that to the creative people, you can just ignore it if it's too hard for you.

May not make sense to you but it did to me.

Many people complained about the settlement stuff to be fair, so lets not just brush it under the carpet of I don't know what Im talking about. People didn't think 4 was as good as 3, I wasn't the only one in this thread and in the world that thought this.



Making an indie game : Dead of Day!