Should Brett Kavanaugh SCOTUS Nomination Continue?

[Final-Fan]

EricHiggin said:

Final-Fan said:

"Why don't you assume McConnell is laughing on the inside?"

Thank you for exposing yourself so clearly as a troll.  I had been actually leaning towards the belief that you were sincerely blinded by your own bias, but there is no way in hell that this is a good faith argument. 

"Assuming I meant McConnell couldn't laugh would be exactly that, an assumption."  Well, perhaps that explains why I didn't assume I was right about why you thought you had disputed my claims but only came up with a potential idea and asked you if it was right—if it wasn't, I was hoping you'd volunteer what the correct explanation was. 

"Where did I mention Hillary or the laughter?"  You can hardly blame me for the fact that you chose to go down this road and ignored the much larger part of my post addressing what you wrote in that post. 

It's not my fault you focused on the title of the clip and the portion that I wasn't talking about, and not the point's I made about the portion within the short clip.

"Please don't ask me to watch videos whose titles are lies.  I didn't see any laugh directed at Clinton. 
"As for what McConnell said, just because the Republicans take their cues nowadays from extremist bloggers, radio talk show hosts, etc., doesn't mean the Democrats are following suit.  Let me know if someone in Congress proposes that, but until then McConnell—and you—are just stretching "a human being in the USA has this idea" to mean "the Democratic Party plans to do this".  I mean, shit, if they were going to pack the court there wouldn't even be a need to impeach Kavanaugh."

This is what you call "focused on the title"?  21 words about it, then 87 words about the other stuff. 

"TYT talking about it and FOX reporting it. They may do either or try both. McConnell smirks in the video which for him is about as close to a laugh as you get."

18 words about the title and 15 words about everything else.  Except even the 15 words were veering off topic, because when I said that you didn't dispute anything I had said you didn't even try to refute me about anything except the title. 

You've been exposed for what you are.  Why not just admit it?