NightlyPoe said:
-One of them can be 100% dismissed. She claims that Kavanaugh was a part of a group of serial gang rapists. That, as a college student, she attended at least a dozen of these high school parties. That at one of them she was raped. And then that she then returned afterwards. This is an easy case of perjury for the accuser and disbarment for the lawyer for giving damaging legal advice to his client for his own publicity purposes. -The other about Kavanaugh exposing himself is significantly less fantastic, but not really worth pursuing. The NYT pointed out that the accuser was literally calling around saying she wasn't sure if it was Kavanaugh just the previous week, not to mention she was so plastered she couldn't tell the difference between a penis and a sex toy. While it wouldn't be a shocker if someone whipped it out during a drunken college party (there's a reason why I was a homebody in my youth), the accuser's fuzzy memory coming into focus after a week of talking to her lawyer disqualifies her as a witness. Even if she believes it 100% now, the reconstruction of memory needed to get to there cannot be trusted. -Kavanaugh's roommate didn't add anything meaningful to the discussion. He gave us a few embarrassing details to what has already been admitted. |
Actually Kavanaugh roommate is the only one I would take from any of this but the issue is that he disputes sworn testimony from Kavanaugh which is the issue. In Kavanaugh urge to make himself appear like some choir boy, he was nothing of the sort at Yale. Personally I really would like a justice to be as truthful as possible but it seems in this day and age, those things are not really important anymore.
