| HylianSwordsman said: Sitting during the national anthem is as newsworthy as the cure for cancer. You heard it here first folks. You want to play the hyperbolic analogy game? Fine. Two can play. Not believing Kavanaugh's accuser, the person who actually survived the rape, is like not believing a murdered person if she told you who the murderer is. Imagine the murder victim came back from the dead in a murder case and pointed out the murderer, whom she personally knew because they went to the same school, and people just tell her she was confused and say that there's no evidence that the suspect committed the murder. Also, the accused murderer is about to be appointed to a powerful position, and people say the murder victim came back from the dead just to be political. Then the murder victim asks for an FBI investigation, but people tell her to shut up and testify so they can force through the murderer's nomination, and the murder never gets solved or even investigated because it's inconvenient for the party in power. |
So you made a poor point just so you could get to the off topic point, initially made to back up what was said about the main topic, on my part at least?
I also dislike how you've made it clear you think the cure for cancer is more important than ending the suppression of blacks and minorities. They are people to you know.
First, a murder victim coming back from the dead doesn't work unless your point is fictional. Secondly, "That doesn't mean she wasn't assaulted", what I said, means she very well may have been assaulted, so why are you suggesting I don't believe her? Do you think because I pointed out the DNC is potentially using her as a stall tactic, that her case isn't worthy of being heard? If your mad you should be mad at the DNC, not me.
The fact that she asked for an FBI investigation doesn't matter. It's not a federal offence so the FBI has nothing to do with it. I'd like the FBI to investigate why one of my neighbors committed suicide, but that's not going to happen either. She hasn't been told to shut up and testify. The GOP had already set up a date for Monday and she refused and wanted a date later in the week and they said sure let's figure it out. As for her asking for Kavanaugh to go first is never going to happen because not only does the system not work that way, it's for good reason, because until you know exactly what your being accused of and the details of it, how are you supposed to know how to defend yourself? She's obviously trying to imply he's guilty and knows what he did so why can't he go first, but many woman in my life have given me beef because "I just should have known", when I never could have. That's not how life and court/hearings work.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.







