DonFerrari said:
I guess you didn't read they aren't hiring a black person, they are hiring anyone that isn't white, so they don't even have her in tune with the rest of the cast unless you want to think that only after they choose the actress they are going to choose the ethnicity of the rest of the country and start doing auditions. And you making her adopted instead of descendant is one of the things that break the lore, but you play it as inconsequential and not accepting must be hatred and vitriol. You say it all but don't accept that you are name calling whoever who disagree with you. |
Again, I never called anyone names. Nor did I say anyone who doesn't agree with my stance of breaking the lore "must be hatred and vitriol" as you put it. You really should read what you are responding to.
If you didn't understand what I wrote, I will break it down for you.
I conceded that the potential breaking of story lore (again, we don't really know what is the reason, so this is all speculation) would ruffle some feathers. I even said I had no problem with that. EXHIBIT A: the first bolded text from my quote.
I followed the thing I do have a problem with. EXHIBIT B: the very sentence following that first bolded text.
The hatred and vitriol and the outrage I am speaking of is the use of fiery language, politicizing the discussion, and even your habit of hurling false accusations at those who don't agree with you.
I am saying it's hard to see that kind of reaction all over a fictional character's change of race. That statement doesn't equate to me saying everyone who has a problem with the work changing the lore is full of hate. If you are reading that in anything I read, you need to reread my posts.
Geez louise.







