deskpro2k3 said:
Do you like not know how semantics work? Here is a quick lesson. Beneath the varying complexion of your thought process there is some intelligible parts but more incoherent and defective ramblings.. Now look I didn't change anything, so I have no idea of what you're talking about. What I gave you in my original post is a false quote that I assumed (keyword) people are using, paired with the actual quotes from the books so people can see the difference. I also give you an example on how to use the word complexion in different ways to describe not only appearances, but the character of something.. Just grab a chair.. no more circular logic, just stop. |
So, once again, "Ciri has an ashen white character".
Of course, she has "fair hair, white character, and green eyes", fits great in the middle of the physical description. More and more ridiculous. And the fact that the word's main meaning is "color of this skin" isn't obvious enough for you? You even had to ask to others "where do you see that she's white?" (which you obviously wouldn't ask if you really knew the meanings of complexion). Other people too told you that your post was wrong.
No circular logic here, just read your post again, accept that you were wrong or at least phrased it wrong, stop being so condescending about it, and move on.
Until you do that, don't worry, I'll stop answering to you. It's clearly not worth it.
