By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
Nautilus said:

I dont know.It wouldnt have performed as well, that much is true, but it would have been a quality game nevertheless.Given that and the lack of big quality games earlier on its life, I think it isnt beyond reason to think it would have sold at least 1 million by now.

Saying that it would have been a quality game regardless is pushing it. Ubisoft had not put much care into Rabbids games for a while and the higher quality of Mario + Rabbids can be safely assumed to be directly caused by Nintendo's involvement, because Ubisoft knew that they would not get Nintendo's agreement for a collaboration without putting in proper effort.

I was assuming that the game tone and vision would remain the same.But yeah, you have got a point.Hell, you are probably right.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1