There is a difference between including and pandering. When the latter is too obvious I count it as bad writing. Not sure if it is a SJW agenda. Its more an SJW when a de is going to insult its audience when they disagree about the pandering. The Lesbian kiss in Tlou 2 is not pushing a SJW agenda.
But if the narrative over the whole game is only women can kick the asses of men and men can only hurt men, I would say it is bad writing. If someone complaints about it and ND is going to call everyone sexist who does that. If they do that they are pushing an SJW agenda.
Now I hope they will not, but seeing how invincible Nadine was, it could be. Though she was a lot better in Lost Legacy as a character. For now I doubt if Tlou 2 wants to push a narrative like that and its rather luck than intended that the women in Tlou 2 seem a bit invincible (in the few trailers I have seen) . There will probably be some male antagonist (lacked) out there which forms a thread to Ellie and her friends.
Which was Star Wars biggest mistake nothing and no one even remotely forms a thread to Rey. Although I doubt its pushing an agenda it is just poor writing. As for BFV its not the inclusion of women that bothers me its the inclusion of a cybernetic superwoman that bothers me and EA's reaction to gamers who thinks that a game based on ww2 should be at least give a credible picture of ww2.
Last edited by Qwark - on 26 August 2018Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar
