zorg1000 said:
Why does that matter? It's ok to pay for full priced, downgraded late ports from 1-2 years ago but when it becomes 3-4 year old, upgraded ports suddenly those people dont have standards? You're being a hypocrite and using double standards. |
Doom and Wolfenstein are indeed old ports and that does indeed count against them; it’s the reason they're not worthy of being listed as top tier 2017/218 Switch games.
But they hold a twofold advantage over the recent plague of Wii U regurgitations:
a) At least they’re far less old.
b) At least they’re current gen games that are being brought into the Nintendo ecosystem for the first time, instead of just Nintendo plundering their own back catalogue for a cheap buck
Recycling Wii U games would not be such a big deal they were reasonably priced and if Nintendo were also providing an adequate supply of fresh content, but neither is the case. They’re just saying “want something to play on your new $300 console? What? You want actual NEW games? LMAO, here’s a game from 4 years ago and the 19,654th Mario Tennis/Party”
So yeah, full price for an 8-month old PS4 port is better than $60 for a 4 year old Wii U game that was $50 even in 2014.
